Quote from: phzi on April 09, 2014, 06:06:05 PM

Quote from: malodin on April 09, 2014, 04:59:04 PM

@poolwaffle,

i was not saying there is a problem, i was only commenting that my hash rate changes via the website but not on cgminer similar to what rocks was saying. that depending upon the coin my reported hash rate on the website shows different than the reported hashrate on cgminer. I did not know about the WU difference.

That is the case with mining period - the pool can never know your exact hashrate, it can only approximate it based on the rate your miner is submitting shares. Small fluctuations like you are seeing will always occur, to everyone. The gridseed issue is a totally separate problem, where significant portions of hashrate appear to be 'lost'.

Quote from: poolwaffle on April 09, 2014, 03:12:08 PM

Edit: I also just realized our "vs LTC" includes the 2% fee we charge. It is based on what is actually earned by user accounts (and thus affected by our fee). I don't know which I feel is better for that column, and I'd like some input if possible. Essentially if we had a perfect (see conditions above) of mining only LTC, we would show 98% of LTC in that column (100% - 2% fee). Showing it with the fee included is more accurate, where "this is what you actually get", then again, if people are factoring the 2% into the calculation afterwards (since it isn't mentioned), it looks worse than it actually is.

Input?

I would suggest adding a comment by the table saying something like, "% vs LTC is calculated by comparison to a PPS pool with 2% fee."

phzi, thanks for that info.