Quote from: agentmike on April 09, 2014, 08:32:41 PM

Quote from: Anonymous on April 09, 2014, 08:26:36 PM

Quote from: agentmike on April 09, 2014, 08:21:51 PM

Quote from: Anonymous on April 09, 2014, 08:19:24 PM

Quote from: WarrenP on April 09, 2014, 07:55:43 PM

Quote from: Anonymous on April 09, 2014, 07:20:59 PM

Let's keep the mintpal votes going, making some good progress!

More voting from my side! We just need to keep pushing the voting. I've been through a couple of coins joining mintpal... people get discouraged and feel like we aren't going to make it... just keep voting.

ECC had a crazy good response to community voting, they got added by Mintpal when they were only a few thousand votes because it was all community action, no buy-ins. This could happen to COMM too - after all, this is the CommunityCoin, right? Let's put that to action starting with getting the votes to put us on Mintpal.

I don't think so. The community is the main reason that Mintpal selected ECC. When Mintpal selected ECC, ECC already had a significant trade volume on other exchanges.
So it's the profitability making ECC selected.

You consider 20 BTC volume significant? BC is an example of a coin that was added to bring them volume. ECC is not. But I do agree that ECC was added because of its community - that was my point.

Ok~ community..community..
But you need know they are leaded by an active dev --- maybe most active I have even saw.
Just look at their daily updated OP and memes..... OMG!
I guess their dev may spend more than 8 hours per day on it.

Anyway, regarding COMM, with it's name it should have a strong, very strong and active community.

In my opinion the management and development team must be established.