You post Z-links and other Russian propaganda as facts.
You publish Western propaganda as facts
I don't. And - as usual with whataboutism deflection - you failed to indicate whether those two things are supposed to be positive or negative. Either case doesn't make sense, but it would be nice if you clarified this point.
without trying to think critically and without understanding the origins of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict at all.
No, I'd say I have a pretty good understanding. Here is a quick recap if you need help: your genocidal dictator invaded Ukraine.
You also post Konashenkov's (who claims to have destroyed more bayraktars, airplanes, and HIMARS launchers than Ukraine ever had) bullshit unironically.
At least, everything is quite consistent with bayraktars. In the summer, Ukrainian sources
called the number of delivered Turkish drones from 60 to 96 (~ 10-16 complexes, one complex includes 6 drones). Konashenkov in his reports announced the destruction of about 85 bayraktars.
There was never any proof beyond speculation of Ukrainians having that many, let alone any proof of Russians destroying that many. It's even more ridiculous with airplanes (because none are being delivered from abroad) and HIMARS launchers (numbers of which are quite public) that Konashenkov destroys in numbers large enough that make even the aforementioned Z-voyenkors cringe.
The cause of WW3 could be the cretinism of the Ukrainian authorities, who, with the help of the Polish incident, tried to draw NATO into a full-fledged war with Russia, and the "British tabloids" provided them with information support in this.
Tabloids publish headlines that draw attention. That's how they get the clicks and the revenue. They don't make policy. I know media is fucked up in Russia, but come on, you must have at least some theoretical understanding on how it works? Do you really think The Sun can start a world war?
Only the full involvement of NATO can save the Zelensky regime from complete failure, even though tens of millions of people could be killed because of this.
Damn, you still think Zelensky as a person and/or his "regime" is what's important in this war. Here's the thing. Putin gives an order to retreat - war ends. Or if he croaks - there's a good chance war ends too. Zelensky does that - war most likely doesn't end. Take a minute to think about that.
Further, Johnny refers to some obscure blog, calling it a "neutral source". Why is it neutral? Obviously because user Johnny called it that.
Of course yes, so we have a neutral source for such information.
Oryx blogOryx collects photo or video proof and goes to painstaking lengths to verify/deduplicate/identify the equipment. As far as sources go, it's one of the best. It's quite telling that you try to discredit it based on who posted the link.