Quote from: Fivestar4everMVP on December 24, 2022, 09:03:50 PM

Quote from: minime0105 on December 24, 2022, 08:46:58 PM

Quote from: brat111111 on December 24, 2022, 11:51:06 AM

Quote from: Babba86 on December 23, 2022, 09:45:08 AM

So my account is fully open, verified and the cashout has just been processed.

Cloudbet is defintely a legit site.

I am changing my original post and adding the withdrawal time.

Here is a link to screenshot with the withdrawal:

https://files.fm/f/fw5np4ptp

It is good that everything is OK with you and you make such post. I play Cloudbet and KYC is obligatory. It is better to pass KYC after registration. Cloudbet is a licenced casino and passing KYC is demand of regulator.

KYC verification is good for everyone, and bypassing KYC verification is not really important in some of the gambling platforms i know very well, so I'm trying to tell you, to understand that gamblling is very risk and in a platform that demands verification or documentation of details, the user supposed at least to know that KYC is for the benefit of the player, so at least you have to understand such scenario that KYC very is necessary.

Like i said in one of my comments earlier in another thread, some players know that indeed, passing KYC is important as this is one of the ways casinos get to put the bad eggs away, but some players are most concern of the safety of their kYC documents in the database/hands the casino, for all i know, some casino, most especially the illegitimate or less popular ones could sell this documents to third parties for monetary profit, and whatever this third party entities do with the documents, only God knows , so i personally do not judge or blame gamblers who are always skeptic about kyc verification.

But my advice the all players is to always stick with the legitimate casinos that have earned a good reputation by their long years of service to the gambling industry without complaint of misconduct or misuse of players identity documents.

this KYC issue is something very sensitive and we have to take it very seriously, for example you talked about new casinos that ask for KYC and that can sell people's documents and that is the reason why people are skeptical of KYC, I I agree, but this is not the only serious part of it all, the biggest problem is that the casino owners are anonymous but they are asking for KYC, the error is not in the casinos, but the error is in the people or governments that created the KYC laws that they committed error of making casino owners remain anonymous but their customers are not anonymous

KYC was created to combat money laundering, so can a person create a casino and launder money? why do they only look at customers as the only ones who can launder money? this situation of making a person put their documents in an anonymous casino is something that creates fear in anyone, even though some people are defending the theory that doing KYC in an old and reliable casino is not a problem, but the old and reliable casino is still anonymous. I did KYC because I respect the laws, so I have no choice for that reason I always make a point of doing KYC without being forced to, in this case I do KYC in the old and reliable casino