Quote from: poncrypto on April 10, 2014, 02:05:35 AM

If you took 5% into the calculation it should have answered you question. You did not DM me back....so how was I supposed to know to respond?

if you opened the spreadsheet i sent twice you would see the 5% is accounted for. everything is accounted for.

in case anyone is afraid to open the spreadsheet, here it is as an image:
http://jeremy.kister.net/tmp/ltcponzi.png

row #15 (because row#1 is a description field) is actually row#14 on ltcponzi.

what it seems, though, is that the 200% final deposit is not being taken from the 5% pool but rather from the investor pool. if this is correct, it explains why #14 was not paid.

you've mentioned several times that the the 5% fee and late deposits are needed "in case the last recorded transaction is 30 LTC" -- e.g., http://ltzponzi.com/faq says that the reason you keep late deposits are "for future cases when there may not be enough transactions to cover the 200% pay back" -- so I am under the impression the final 200% was not coming out of the investor pool. am I wrong there ?