Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 11:49:49 AM

Quote from: MetaMallVerse on Today at 08:47:22 AM

Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 08:04:52 AM

Quote from: MetaMallVerse on Today at 07:44:31 AM

[...] These are the final words to be said in this matter.

Sure, let's talk about something else,

Quote from: MetaMallVerse on December 25, 2022, 06:36:09 PM

You are completely right about checking the work part, we were very busy with many other tasks and we did not check for plagiarism. We will for sure be more careful for the rest of the journey, we will not outsource writing works. We will hire an in-house writer to handle such tasks.

I am not sure how swamped it needs to be for a team to be unable to check something that literally took less than minutes, so how many people are there in your team, again? I can't see any details about your team.

Of course, we have a team and you will meet with them at the second version of the Whitepaper. We did not add their names at version 1 because we are still forming the official structure of the team.

Very nice. When can we expect this hopefully-not-plagiarized-anymore whitepaper v.2.0? It's worth mentioning that you're currently having your crowd sale running, people would need that important document before they could --and should-- consider and weighing if it's on their best interest to put their egg in your basket. I'll boldly assume these team will have transparent identity, real pic, etc. and not the good-old cartoonish avatar of your team?

You can expect the second version of the whitepaper by the second week of January. As long as they will have LinkedIn links with real information, it's not a problem to use avatars I think. It does not mean we will use avatars but that's my own view. I can point you to more than 50 projects that have their team with avatars and or with NO TEAM they rock since long time. But don't worry I wont ask you why you did not pull their leg.