There are some excellent posts made here which deserve a reply, unfortunately when I found an utterly pointless post from Royse777 asking I do not type her name therefore had to address that inconvenience first. I will reply to the excellent posts in the next post.

Quote from: Stalker22 on December 24, 2022, 02:09:25 PM

JollyGood, I noticed that you mentioned a particular signature campaign. Could you share publicly which campaign it is about and which members specifically contacted you? It is possible that the signature campaign manager made this a requirement, though I have never seen such requirements before.

Royse777 is managing the sinbad.io campaign. Though something went wrong with the post which received the neutral tag for the OP in the other thread (the neutral tag deservedly has been removed), the second signature campaign applicant also was allowed on to the signature campaign with the neutral tag and it became a problem later. If it was a requirement from the campaign manager it should have not have been an issue after applicants were selected for campaigns. I also have never seen such a requirement before.

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on December 25, 2022, 06:46:13 AM

I agree it's a definite improvement, but it's perplexing why people would be asking JG to remove neutrals (I haven't finished reading this thread, but I get the sense that it somehow matters to one or more bounty managers).

Perplexing is the apt word. Royse777 employed campaign participants knowing they had neutral feedback then encouraged them to try to have them removed.

Quote from: Royse777 on December 28, 2022, 11:11:05 PM

@JollyGood, stop typing my name. Consider it a very polite request to you in public.

What a pointless comment from you. Your name will be mentioned when asked by other to name or if needed in context. Just because yahoo62278 asked for his name to stop being used when you threw tantrums in the Bitlucy/Royse777 scam threads and mostly his request was adhere to, it does not mean you can simply ask members to stop typing your name.

In the OP and beyond I clearly avoided using your name but at some point members wanted to know which campaign manager would employ members with neutral feedback then encourage to try to have them removed on the basis it was affecting their chances of staying on the campaign. Poker Player seems to have summed up part of the issue with you and I am adding you back to my ignore list:

Quote from: Poker Player on December 27, 2022, 04:54:38 AM

Quote from: JollyGood on December 24, 2022, 07:54:52 AM

The timing of this has coincided with a particular signature campaign being managed by a particular campaign manager who was vouching for a neutral trust to be removed from a participant but I will not claim that is the only reason I am receiving PMs,

Yes, well, a manager who himself has 6 neutral tags changed from negative and who seems to care so much about neutral tags that he disregards them when accepting people into his campaign:

Quote

Both joker_josue and NdaMk had a neutral tag on their profiles before signing up for your campaign. If you doubt the quality of their "product", then why did you accept them in the campaign in the first place?

For me it is more a question of ego, of someone who is overflowing with ego and runs $100 a week signature campaigns now, so his ego is even more boosted. I'm curious to see if he wins the antihero award, as you have to think that people who get paid from his campaigns or think they might do so in the future are unlikely to nominate him for that "award".

At the moment he has quite a few votes.