If you think about the feedback that I left (The casino locked a customer account accusing the player of doing "late betting". Not a single example of a late bet has been shown to date to warrant such an action.), it's still valid even today. They unfroze the player's betting account in the meantime, but the point is that they initially closed it for a non-valid reason trying to trick the community into believing the player was involved in late betting. And after all that time, there is still no example of a late bet.

I haven't looked at Poika5's case, but my gut feeling is there won't be ay proof there either. Since I am not familiar with that incident, it's wrong to leave ratings about it. I am sure these two incidents aren't isolated cases. Deleting one feedback only to add the exact same or a similar one mentioning a different link doesn't change anything. Changing the 1st to neutral and adding a new one does. It adds a new "point" in their overall score. Although I consider them and their PR person/manager/whatever he is a disgusting individual who secretly edits posts thinking that will get rid of the false information shared previously, I am not going to punish them with an additional feedback for something I haven't investigated in detail.