I understand your point of view; furthermore, I agree with it. But tell me this: how many times have you seen, in the past 5000 years, a fair governance...?
A really 100% fair governance is difficult to achieve because in a society, you'll have different points of views. For example, you have bought a new house in the suburbs. Then, a new street directly to the city center will be build directly behind your garden. Some people will like it to get easier and faster to the city center. Some businessmen will like it to have faster delievery time to the city center. But you and your neightbours won't like it most likely since you'll get noise and pollution from the traffic.
There are always conflicting interests, we could find much more examples.
So, even a completely fair governance will not prevent such things but it can try to improve things as much as possible.
As someone from Germany, we have seen a wide range of governance forms.
Interestingly, the more decentralized ones have been much more fair (Weimarer Republik (1919-1933) and our current form (BRD = Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Western Germany) based on Grundgesetz (constitution from 1949)).
Although I need to say that Weimarer Republik got abused when Hitler seized power in 1933 and set up a new form of government (fascism) removing the democratic core principles Weimarer Republik - and we know what he did later.
And then, we had a form of government existing in parallel with BRD (Western Germany), called DDR (Eastern Germany). BRD and DDR existed in parallel until DDR collapsed in 1989 and Germany was united as BRD.
DDR has been a Communist dictatorship and tried to build a wall (Berlin wall) to prevent people from fleeing to Western Germany because Western Germany had much more liberties and simply a better living standard.
I don't know Romanian history but I believe DDR has been similar to Ceausescu dictatorship? Both were abolished in 1989.
Bitcoin is a great example here because of censorship resistance. It's very dificult to abuse Bitcoin. Not impossible like a 51% attack but attacking it will lead to a very high cost for the attacker. A cost, he can't afford. Proof of WORK.
But I also think mixing Bitcoin and real-life issues lacks a bit comparability.
Bitcoin might be fair but it can't be applied to our street issue above.