Quote from: SatoPrincess on Today at 05:58:24 PM

Part of being a campaign manager is the responsibility of managing campaign funds. I dont see a way out of this except the manager is willing to pay the campaign participants out of his own pocket. I feel sympathy for you, its a bad situation youre in.

Quote from: pawel7777 on Today at 05:51:35 PM

Quote from: Edwardard on Today at 05:38:34 PM

The main question here is will @OP pay to the participants of coinomize signature campaign from his pocket or should we consider that we have advertised 1week for free?

The main question is if the OP intends to repay all his creditors. As far as I know ~75% of the stolen funds were due to Yomix. Campaign participants do not have any priority here.

Emotions and judgements aside, the question is how do we proceed from here. I see 2 options:

1 - OP gets bashed left and right, gets multiple negative feedback - result -> he's no longer able to earn from his bounty/signature campaigns activity -> leaves the forum -> creditors get nothing

2 - OP negotiates with creditors to work out some mid to long-term plan of repayment -> creditors withhold from giving him a neg trust until he's repaying -> he's still able to make income on the forum but obliges himself to use either multisig address or escrow service of a more trusted 3rd party until the debts are repaid. -> creditors get paid (slowly but still) and OP has a chance to keep his income stream and rebuild his reputation.

Thoughts?

As I know how things work here, option 1 comes first. If OP pays back the campaign funds, the negative tags can be reviewed and changed if need be.

Yeah I know, but this forum is not famous for smartness.

Giving OP option to earn and repay without him handling any funds > crippling his ability to earn and expect him to repay rather than just to f*** off from the forum.

Anyhow, it's down to OP and the people he owes to make such discussion.