Quote from: 100knot2dae on Today at 10:25:25 AM

Quote from: kano on Today at 09:49:20 AM

Quote from: 100knot2dae on Today at 07:51:05 AM

Quote from: kano on Today at 05:05:10 AM

Quote from: kano on December 06, 2022, 01:58:13 PM

Quote from: 100knot2dae on December 06, 2022, 09:41:22 AM

Quote from: yoshimitsu777 on December 05, 2022, 08:51:11 AM

who do you mean?i did not advertise code for free.i had quoted the patch to ask if you had referred to it in your previous reply because it was not clear.

still unanswered is your statement that this patch sends coins to a foreign address. I'd love to understand, but you don't seem to want to answer.

does anyone else know what kano means and what it has to do with this patch?

Just ignore it. Up to now he has never come up with his own approach - and he probably never will - but rather spends his time on telling other people's work off. That's the real tragedy here.

All I can say is that FOR ME, this golden-guy patch has proven to find blocks countless times on BTC testnet and other forks when solo mining on an own node. And I have tested this with lots of different addresses by now.

But this is no promo, no recommendation and you always do things at your own risk.

Quoted for posterity, coz that's a pretty specific statement you make there.

Meanwhile, as most now know, coz I pointed out why in discord weeks ago, and that info has spread, indeed 100knot2dae was telling people to use a patch that would fail if any address you used didn't start with 1.
All new wallets by default do not use 1 address.

Let it be Kano...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5373190.msg58531767#msg58531767
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5373190.msg61436321#msg61436321

Yet you posted here about it and didn't point out that problem anywhere here before I pointed out the random address issue ...
You even then followed up as can be seen above "And I have tested this with lots of different addresses by now." <- which will fail with most address.
Then you didn't even bother replying with the issue but instead post shit about me - lol.
Yeah fine you mentioned it once last year, but then go around telling people here it's OK to use it without pointing out that for most of them it will fail.

You had your chance to shine on this topic for a long time, but decided against. That was your decision.

However, by now everybody who had serious interest in the solo mining topic was aware of this fact. It is with reason that e.g. the golden-guy version of cgminer has added a bitcoin address check (https://github.com/golden-guy/cgminer/commit/90d03dd12f4b7d800eb9976356875c9c003aac2e for P2PKH addresses when solo mining.

Nothing else to say here. So please stop this senseless discussion, at least I will now.

The patch you and others quoted to use
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5373190.msg61184493#msg61184493
does NOT include that fix and you didn't point out the 1 address requirement.
That was the reason for my post after those posts.
You fucked up and I pointed out it would generate a random address payment.
Seriously, get your facts straight.