Below is
Coinbox1's reply in regards to the most recent development for the case. I'll gladly play an owl as they're seemingly stand by their words and refused to reply here.
Mr. holydarkness,
It is funny that you ask this now. Because right in the beginning you had been told exactly why we cannot publicly show such sensitive information.
Hi holydarkness,
[...]
However, kindly note that our updated internal policies forbid us from sharing such details in public forums, unless particularly authorized by our management and approved by the player. This is for both privacy and anti-abuse concerns. In fact, for the sake of open and transparent communication with Bitcointalk community, we had shared such details on the forum in the past, which did get us quite some compliments. However such transparency was later exploited by abusers who saw it.
So
again, just so this is clear: We have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars and countless hours developing mechanisms to combat abusers. By publicly showing these sensitive details as evidence, the abusers lurking for abuse opportunities will figure out ways to beat our mechanism. In fact, this has happened before and we had been burnt.
As how I've stated
here, I have been weighting upon this decision for a while now as OP's activities and involvement on his case seems to became more and more sporadic, as well as how they seems to put less and less effort on their case, tilting the balance of the weight more towards the validity of decision made by AG.
To be honest, it was in my sincerest hope that bumping this thread by reposting OP's defense from other thread will sparks OP's activity, as that seeems to be not the situation here, it became less and less fair to keep the tag on
Coinbox1.
Don't get me wrong here, I am still in my opinion that TD's actions toward resolving disputes are more in poor side, but I have to agree that --under these recent developments and situation where OP keeps being absent-- it is not fair to keep the tag, especially considering the above defense made by TD against providing evidences, as stated on the last part of the quoted post from them, is within the realm of reasonable.
As such, the tag will be changed to neutral to serve as a reminder for this case.