Quote from: dwyane36 on January 18, 2023, 10:44:26 PM

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on January 18, 2023, 01:47:17 PM

I think something, if we see the casino from a business point of view, it is not bad that they allocate a lot of funds to marketing, especially here in the forum they have good results, I don't know if they remember it, but when Betfury was in its beginnings they They started with some very strong campaigns here on bitcointalk and on the altcointalks forum, and that was a great success at the time, but why?

Yeah, Betfury's first signature campaign was definitely successful. By the way, it's worth noting that Betfury also had other successful cases of promoting its platform. For example, Betfury announced a BTC puzzle in mid-2020, which was solved only six months later. Obviously, this kind of marketing is also a good option to promote the project because the Betfury team only spent 0.5 BTC (~$5k) on the prize, while this puzzle attracted new users to the website for at least half a year.

Oh sure, how can I forget it, the one with the private keys, of course that was one of the best moments that the casino had at that time, I was very active on the discord channel, but later I didn't like how one of The moderators treated me at that moment, at that precise moment I stopped being in that group, because no matter how well a casino does, they don't have to raise their spirits to treat the players badly, I think that many times they treated me I wanted to make some suggestions but then I treated them badly, so these things are tiring and to avoid being rude it is better to leave, after that I went less to the casino.

Quote from: len01 on January 30, 2023, 09:34:18 AM

Quote from: o48o on January 29, 2023, 10:11:11 PM

Quote from: len01 on January 29, 2023, 09:49:04 PM

but there seems to be no sign yet that BetFury will continue the signature campaign. on the other hand there is a problem that must be resolved by BetFury to return to make its trusted reputation even better.
somehow for what it must have been maybe I missed something that the BetFury representatives are getting negative trust. it needs to be resolved soon before the signature campaign starts again. because if not, participants are also afraid to join the campaign.

Well negative trust is not going to be solved by signature campaigns. In fact if people see that accusation negative enough they might even give negative trust to people wearing the signature. Like with 1xbit. But i think that would need several unsolved and proven withdraw issues. I don't see Betfury's negative trust such a bad issue it could be. It's just annoying and embarrassing for anyone advertising it.

And there are other ways to advertise this. Just make really good plans with tokenomics and bfg holders will sell this place by themselves as it would be their interest to get way more inflow.

I'm not saying trust can be solved with signature campaigns, but I'm saying if Betfury wants to do another signature campaign, maybe it should solve the problem first, or at least the trust becomes neutral.
so that marketing through signatures is back on and there are new participants knowing that Betfury representatives have no problems regarding trust, they will not hesitate to join the platform.

maybe the red trust in the representative account for us is not a problem, but it would be better if it turned out to be neutral.

This is your very important point, what you say about trust is something decisive, because here in the forum when it comes to reputation it is a plus that gives the go-ahead or bad to everything, although the signature campaign is something that It helps a lot, because it not only employs members of the forum, but also that they are advertising the company, and the users who do so are affirming that it is a company that complies, however, any misunderstanding must be resolved, and not left to the nothing, if there is a misunderstanding here, the casino must solve it and not delay the matter any longer, because in the future that will have a lot of repercussions.