I believe you know there are procedures this platform would follow before anything of that nature you have said could be looked into. At first, these are senior forum members you are talking about for ban which would need you to provide proof beyond reasonable doubt which you have none as I can see here. You made a comment about a previous thread but where is the link here, do you think people would believe you by just this mere post without any link to previous thread where you said you have started with such claims and also, no proof of your point on false accusations by the names as mentioned by you. I would advise you to let the bygone be bygones. Like as @little mouse has said, that forum does not moderate trust feedback and I think it would be difficult getting them banned for the tag on your account but you can still appeal your tag if you insist.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436623.new#newthats the thread, all evidence is in there (combined with the negative trust and 1xbit thread).
I accuse them of making false accusations, because they have not provided any proof that what they say is real. So therefore they should be gone, maybe then the distrust is also gone, I don't know. The trust is just a part.
Its not because someone is a senior member they know it all, in this case they clearly don't. So please investigate my comments and their comments and look at what proof people provided.
JollyGood and ScamVirus can not be banned because they tag you, not part of the rules.
I didn't tag the OP. He has come to this condition because of his behavior. I said against 1xbit, I don't see why he would have a problem with that. If someone makes accusations, it is natural to ask for evidence to know more details.
There are so many complaints against 1xbit if I support that gambler, what is his problem? He is busy making false arguments. I think he will be banned if he opens one thread after another!
Again saying I make false arguments, where? Do you have proof?