Quote from: DarkStar_ on Today at 05:04:40 AM

I won't rule making large changes out, but ultimately there will always be trust needed somewhere. If you're after the highest level of privacy, your privacy model should not rely on needing to trust me to keep your payout addresses private.

I had to comment because I thought this was the best sentence in that debate. I apologize for meddling in the subject.

This campaign has existed since 2017, and since its inception it has worked in the same way - with the respective updates over time. Those who signed up knew the rules and accepted them. Of course, things can be done differently, as long as it's better for everyone. Managing a campaign of this size is not easy. Increasing the workload at the time of payments, I think that's everything you don't want, so there are no mistakes.

When information is shared with a third party, that same information is no longer private. This must be the first principle to take into account in order to have privacy.

Therefore, it is easier for each user to manage how he receives money from this campaign, than for DarkStar_ to do this work for the users. I believe that everyone here knows the best way to receive payment for this campaign, and then use the mix to divert attention from the final destination of the money.

Good week everyone!