I'm not saying trust can be solved with signature campaigns, but I'm saying if Betfury wants to do another signature campaign, maybe it should solve the problem first, or at least the trust becomes neutral.
so that marketing through signatures is back on and there are new participants knowing that Betfury representatives have no problems regarding trust, they will not hesitate to join the platform.
maybe the red trust in the representative account for us is not a problem, but it would be better if it turned out to be neutral.
The "negative" that they have is regarding their affiliate, so if you are a gambler and not an affiliate marketing person, nothing has changed for you and will not change for you in the future. Doesn't have anything to do with any withdrawal problems or anything like that, they have been pristine and amazing about that. The fact about their negative is that they had a higher percentage given for their affiliates, and they lowered it.
I remember clearly that Binance had 50% affiliate income when they first started, and dropped it significantly later on, if they had an account here on bitcointalk, people would have to give them negative trust for that too if that's the case. I believe any company has a right to change the affiliate offer, but some people disagree, that has nothing to do with the casino part of it.