Quote from: ibminer on Today at 08:34:23 PM

I guess my point was that the Most earned merit link could already be accessed through the "?" for Most Recognized. I don't know, maybe I'm confused.. it's been a long day. Tongue

Ohhhhhhh got you now! And I saw it, you are right! I confirm, the link is there and it's accessible.

Quote from: ibminer on Today at 08:34:23 PM

I was a little confused because I thought the Most Posts report was already linked under the Most Activity's "?", but I was mistaken on that one, so that might be a place where we could add a link to the 'most posts' report, maybe under the Most Activity "?"
... but are you saying you don't consider the "?" links to be "on the home page" and/or not prominent enough?

The "?" are indeed on the home page. Maybe they can be extended a bit, though? Of course, if code allows. Regarding the place of the link for Most posts, at the moment, the description shown when clicking on the "?" of Activity looks like this:

Quote

Most Activity is calculated
using:
min(time * 14, posts)

time = number of 2 week
periods in which a member
has posted since their
registration

posts = total number of
posts

Maybe you can insert the hyperlink for Most posts on the "posts" term highlighted by me? Alternatively, there is an empty line between the last line (the one with highlighted "posts") and the term "registration". Maybe the line with "posts" can be placed on this empty line from above, thus in the text box last line will be empty and you can add there something like "For Most posts click here".

Quote from: ibminer on Today at 08:34:23 PM

To get a little technical, this is in the sense that we are talking about the standard sized screens and resolutions most people would be using, which is what the responsive design of the site was intended to work best with.

Yes, it makes sense.

Quote from: ibminer on Today at 08:34:23 PM

Fun related fact: [...] Putting 1 rank table in the middle saved the space needed to cleanly fit the 4 tables next to it, allowed longer username lengths, and I think looked better (but was ultimately harder to design..).

This is interesting, as it shows how agile if the mind of a web designer and coder