Quote from: decodx on February 04, 2023, 08:05:59 PM

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on February 04, 2023, 07:04:47 PM

So what's the controvery here, exactly? Is it that Royse777 isn't accepting people into his campaign based on neutral feedbacks from DT members? I just want to make sure I'm following correctly.

<...>

If this is about something different and I'm reading things wrong (always possible), somebody please school me on what the problem is here.

I believe it went something like this: Royse777 decided to accept members for the campaign even though they had neutral tags on their profiles. Later, he had an issue with selecting participants who had a neutral trust, so he informs the members that they had to clear certain neutral tags from their trust page if they wanted to remain in the campaign.

The way the italicised words sound, and even the statement made by other users, it looks as if a user has the power to remove the tags on their pages themselves.
Tbh, I know how difficult it used to be for people to convince someone like JG to remove a tag.
Besides, I don't think it's even necessary to remove a neutral tag. When a neg tag is harsh, the victim begs or makes a case and such a neg tag would be removed or revised to neutral tag. In my opinion, I think neutral tag is something that will likely remain their because it doesn't pose much threat.