Quote from: DooMAD on February 10, 2023, 05:59:18 PM

Quote from: fuckwit1 on February 10, 2023, 02:51:05 PM

childish idiots pretending they are having adult conversation

In adult conversations, people don't just repeat their empty wishlist over and over for years on end, like a gormless toddler at Christmas. You keep asking for things that are not possible. Tell us how you achieve the goal of having no softforks at any point in future. You've had since 2017 to come up with something. Surely you have an idea by now? Is your best answer still "be a nazi piece of shit and dictate what devs are and aren't permitted to code"? I'm guessing your primitive brain still hasn't progressed beyond authoritarianism. You are the child. A whiny, petulant one, at that.

im not dictating anything because as you admit. i have not released code to control the network.
so that proves your wrong about me being the network dictator
but who's code is the solo code reference client everyone else follows.. oh yea core.
so what does that make core

its funny how your narrative changes to shift blame or deflect who is doing what
its funny how your narrative changes. those that say the truth only have one narrative that sticks.. those that cant decide what to say each week. are the ones that either dont know or are lying

devs can code what they like but what the network decides should be decided by majority, as was the case 2009-2016
you love the idea that the majority does not decide anymore 2017+ and instead allow core devs to be the ones that slide things in without a consensus (consent by majority)

your ok with core throwing things in without needing the majority ready to verify whatever core slide in

you are ignorant to history and facts and ability when it suits you. but then twist it to fit your defense league team motto when it suits you

consensus was strong until it went soft

again funny part is your narratives change depending on which one fits some core defense narrative
EG you forgetting that things went soft,, yet then pretend core are the trusted group because you then pretend the majority consented to core.. (you pretending consensus is hard majority)
but then say the majority didnt need to consent because the network is now permissionless and soft(backward compatible) to not need consent to allow core updates and you are happy core can throw things in via soft (abstinence)

you pretend the network never was hard and cant go hard again
even though it can
but you dont want that to happen
you are willing to REKT anyone that tries