So basically because I haven't agreed with your thought logic, and because Rizzrack also didn't agree with you, your impressive detective skills have deducted that I'm an alt account of his
Wrong. Re-read what I wrote above: I said
I think it's so (without
being certain), as he opposed the flag just after you made your first post here. And today again: he wrote that he wanted to say something then he changed his mind and 20 minutes later you appear with another post. This is a big coincidence, isn't it?
In any case, as I also wrote once more,
In any case, no matter if coincollector12is his alt or not
Do you understand this?
It does not matter if you are his alt or not.
But hey lets put our money where our mouth is
Let's not. Do you think I am as imbecile as saxydev?
lets make a deal, I can prove that I'm not an alt account of Rizzrack, so how about a friendly wager of 0.1 BTC, escrowed of course. I'm assuming since you already have it all figured out at this point it's easy money for you.
First of all, as I said above, it does not matter who's alt you are.
Second of all, I am not as imbecile as the scammer, to accept such lure.
Third of all,
as 1miau also wisely said,
there is no way in the world for you to prove in an undeniable way you are not Rizzrack's alt.
So please find someone else to make deals with, I am not saxydev.
Instead, I see that again, like Rizzrack, you throw some words then change the subject. I answered to every statement of yours, point by point. Why don't you answer to mine? I will repeat them below, highlighted, thus you can see the questions, in case you missed them.
First questionSaying things like " Based on his IQ, which is a number lower than the one of his shoe size" or "He just writes idiotic stuff and, together with his level of very low education reminds me a lot of another Romanian imbecile".
NewsletterBitcoin fuck off
Fuck off, you are just an idiot dear NewsletterBitcoin.
Well mr. NewsletterBitcoin fuck off.
you are the mf'er.
Perhaps you see him very well educated, uhm? Second questionHow the flag system is intended to work?
I placed a screenshot above, perhaps you missed. Let me help you out:

In this case, the damage consists in 0.1 BTC which dkbit98 did not receive from the other party, although he was entitled to receive this amount. dkbit98
was scammed by saxydev.
Do you see the highlight from the screenshot? Third questionsaxydev and dkbit had no cancellation policy. However, since the deal was made based on mutual agreement of the two parties, it's common sense that it's cancellation would have also to imply both parties and not allow a unilateral cancelling. And, since dkbit98 did not agree with the cancelling proposal of saxydev, this implied that the deal was still valid. Does this make sense?