Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on Today at 06:04:32 PM

I believe that these sticky topics created by authors with negative Trust should not be sticky anymore, as they do not offer credibility to the boards they belong, to the ones which read them and to the forum as a whole. It's a situation similar to the one related to DT2 users with negative Trust. However, if that situation is difficult to be solved, this one has real chances to be solved, if there is willing about doing so.

None does matter except the contents of the topic. The contents are still useful, still a good guide to report a scam accusation. So all seems good.

Quote from: dkbit98 on Today at 06:42:52 PM

Lauda also had negative trust even before he left the forum and got banned, other members found some cases when he did plagiarism in his early days, but I think we have several sticky topics from him.

Compering Lauda with escrow.ms is only viable with the feedback of their trust page. I don't think the OP was talking about only the feedback page but the whole escrow.ms thing. Lauda banned herself and wanted to disappear with her own will. If she would not decide to disappear then she would still thrive.

Quote from: digaran on Today at 09:02:21 PM

After rewriting their topics, should the new OP credit the original author by mentioning their names or just plagiarize them?

I like how you leave troll questions. Good for you 🤣
No, we don't need to know each others, the answer you asked me in another thread.