Quote from: Helena Yu on Today at 01:13:22 PM

Chilling with my own baked Bitcoin egg pie Grin

That looks amazing! Great job, Helena!

Quote from: Biodom on February 17, 2023, 07:36:32 PM

@jjg...you are posting pure nonsense.

@bitebits reference analyzed ALL scenarios and the conclusion is there:

"LS consistently outperforms DCA across all time periods, short term and long term.
The longer the time period, the more LS tends to outperform DCA."

You can't fight the math...but, of course, you will.

Hiding behind "normies" having no money, etc etc does not mean that what you peddle is correct.
"Normies" have money, and if they don't, they could even borrow some against some property if they want to get a lump sum.
I did it myself a couple times in the oughts.
In fact, we both know that my LS strategy vastly outperfomed your DCA.

I feel like this is going to throw shade on other DCA strategies and I do not like it. The "study" was based entirely on a DCA type based on buying on a fixed time interval with a fixed sum. The other types of DCA were not even considered.

Buying each dip with a continuous income source is a completely different kind of DCA which was not discussed here. Lets be clear that buying each dip > LS > Time Interval DCA. Obviously this type is not a risk-spreading DCA as the one being discussed but rather a profit maximization DCA which is infinitely more important.

If you were to compare a continuous income source time interval DCA to a BTFD DCA, which do you think would win?