Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on Today at 07:26:52 PM

Quote from: 1miau on February 18, 2023, 08:23:06 PM

In our German local section, mr.relax committed already an offence recently: mr.relax luring readers into risky trades (and therefore losing Sats) [...]

~mr.relax

Ohhh come on, not this clown again!

Yet he is back in action!

Unfortunately, this clown is at is again... Undecided

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on Today at 07:26:52 PM

I believe that our mr.relax barely knows anything about Trust and feedbacks, as he noticed my feedback only in November last year when, of course, he came to me, very angry, asking me to remove the negative feedback I wrote. I explained to him that it wasn't a negative feedback, but a neutral one and, in case he wants to see how a negative looks like this can be arranged.

You are absolutely right here...
When it comes to trust, mr.relax is completely clueless and he doesn't listen to advice / explanations.
He claimed multiple times last year, that we would have left him negative / "bad" Trust.
Which is not true because it's just neutral Trust. Roll Eyes

Quote from: mr.relax on December 07, 2022, 08:35:35 AM

...Nur zu. Oder verteile negativen Trust.

Quote

Die Hater dürfen mir deshalb trotzdem weiterhin negativen Trust geben, weil ich angeblich Opfer in "get rich fast schemes" locke.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5438474.0

I could give some more examples, but spending time to search about "bad trust" statements is a waste of time...

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on Today at 07:26:52 PM

If I remember well, he replied, apologized for using wrong terms, but then he sent me a retaliatory feedback though:

A "bad" trust, dear GazetaBitcoin. Cheesy

It's probably the opposite of "positive" Trust. Or is it "good" Trust? And "neutral" doesn't exist?
We don't know... Huh