1miau, what would you consider a 10 out of 10 Block Explorer?
Good question. 
I don't really have an answer for your question but as we all know nothing is perfect, I believe there are always few improvements to implement.
Maybe Blockchair could also be rated 9/10 but for whatever reason, it's currently 8/10.
Loooooool but you added Blockchair to the list
Yet you talk like someone else rated it only with 8/10 Maybe I wanted to see some more improvements?
I also believe it deserves a better mark.
You are right, maybe we can make a public survey. And, changing it is very simple, as it's only up tp you for 2 reasons: (1) you are topic's author, thus you can change marks anyway (smile) and (2) this explorer was suggested by you, thus you are not changing the mark against someone else's will, if you believe it should have a better mark.
But, would it be legitimate to change it? If we change it, everyone would come up and try to change ratings? In my opinion, we need a public survey to be legitimate.
From my perspective I'd go even more far than 9/10 and I'd give it 10/10 for the following reason: it's the best one we have! As a consequence, all other ones will be compared with best one, right? Therefore, if it is best one we have, it actually deserves 10/10, no matter that it can be improved here and there.
Sheeesh. We need to have space for improvements, dear GazetaBitcoin.
If another explorer will come up, having all Blockchair features and also some more nice additions then it will be marked with 10/10 and change Blockchair's mark to 9/10. Does this make sense?
My favorite would be to arrange a public survey and by doing so, we could review the public opinion. Do you agree here? You are right, I need to spell PrivacyG's name properly, my dear GazetaBitcoin.
I'll do it correctly from now on and in Romanian it's Intimitate(a)G's (because PrivacyG might be female).
Unfortunately, the gender of our nyms don't also reveal our real genders I'll do it correctly from now on and in Romanian it's Intimitate(a)G's (because PrivacyG might be female
). Yet I have my reasons for also believing that PrivacyG is a chick 
And I don't beleive, that PrivacyG is a chicken. If so, it would be called ChickenG
Now it came into my mind to vote PrivacyG at Miss BitcoinTalk category during BCA 2023.
Nominating PrivacyG at Miss BitcoinTalk category during BCA 2023 would be a legitimate consideration, dear GazetaBitcoin. It's probably me, dear GazetaBitcoin.
We could do it like that, if it's ok for everyone [...]
Any opinions, if the layout above is decent, are welcome.
Any opinions, if the layout above is decent, are welcome.
You trimmed it well, padawan! And it's almost there! 99%! I will explain and also propose a solution for having it perfectly fitting the screen!
As shown in the above picture, I think we can shorten "Usefulness" column with 3 characters, by deleting that emoji. Having "Usefulness" column shortened then, maybe "Comments" column can be expanded with 3 characters.
Are you dense?
We don't delete the emoji, dear GazetaBitcoin!
I hope this helps.
Yes, it helps, should be properly formatted now? Plz confirm, Sirs!
Later edit: PrivacyG has one more suggestion but I guess shyness prevailed ()). He (?) said that he believes that Atomic explorer is not actually redirecting to Trezor explorer website. Instead, he believes that Atomic copies Trezor's website and that there is only a very small difference between the two websites.
Ok, many thanks for the input. So, what's our conclusion? )). He (?) said that he believes that Atomic explorer is not actually redirecting to Trezor explorer website. Instead, he believes that Atomic copies Trezor's website and that there is only a very small difference between the two websites.In our current explanation, it says Atomic explorer is mirroring Terezor explorer, which should be accurate?