⭐ Merited by 1miau (4)
You are right, maybe we can make a public survey. 
[...]
But, would it be legitimate to change it? If we change it, everyone would come up and try to change ratings?
In my opinion, we need a public survey to be legitimate.
[...]But, would it be legitimate to change it? If we change it, everyone would come up and try to change ratings?
In my opinion, we need a public survey to be legitimate.
Well, if you want so much to be politically correct, who am I to stop you?
Seriously now, I think it's a good idea. Let's make a poll about it.From my perspective I'd go even more far than 9/10 and I'd give it 10/10 for the following reason: it's the best one we have! As a consequence, all other ones will be compared with best one, right? Therefore, if it is best one we have, it actually deserves 10/10, no matter that it can be improved here and there.
Sheeesh. We need to have space for improvements, dear GazetaBitcoin.
=)))
Picture this: we all know that Usain Bolt is fastest man alive, right? Now let's suppose he did not run 100m in 9.58" but in 15". And nobody else would run this distance faster than him. Therefore we would still consider him fastest man alive, right? No matter that he runs 100m in 15" and we actually know that it's possible to do it in 9.58". Does that make sense?
Now imagine this analogy regarding Blockchair. Nevertheless, a poll with more users voting what they think about Blockchair is a fair choice.And I don't beleive, that PrivacyG is a chicken. If so, it would be called ChickenG. And it would be neutral (it).
ChickenG
(By the way, in Romanian chicken is a substantive having also feminine gender
)Nominating PrivacyG at Miss BitcoinTalk category during BCA 2023 would be a legitimate consideration, dear GazetaBitcoin.
Then we must coerce icopress somehow to not cancel this category.
Done, I've implemented a part of your suggestions to trim it 1% more.
Yay!
Deleting the emoji??!! 
Are you dense?
We don't delete the emoji, dear GazetaBitcoin!
Are you dense?
We don't delete the emoji, dear GazetaBitcoin!
Pardon my blasphemy
Emoji must stay!Yes, it helps, should be properly formatted now?
Plz confirm, Sirs!
Plz confirm, Sirs!
It seems the 1% trim worked just fine. I noticed the "as" from BitcoinWhosWho, which was not shown earlier, is shown now, as you placed it on the second row. Besides, the "t" from "edit", which was also not shown, appears well now.
1miau, you are tables master! I bow down! Can we have this update implemented in OP now? (I took the screenshot from post #141.)
Ok, many thanks for the input. So, what's our conclusion?
In our current explanation, it says Atomic explorer is mirroring Trezor explorer, which should be accurate?
In our current explanation, it says Atomic explorer is mirroring Trezor explorer, which should be accurate?
For me, the comment is fine as it is now. Let's see though what PrivacyG says about this.
@GazetaBitcoin and @1miau:
I do know both of you probably hate dealing with complicated codes, so I tried to simplify the table in a manner that it could show everything without being too wide in smaller resolutions...
I do know both of you probably hate dealing with complicated codes, so I tried to simplify the table in a manner that it could show everything without being too wide in smaller resolutions...
I love complex BBCode the way I love wearing winter pyjama trousers during hot summer
- We can create a hover box by using the abbreviation tag in order to combine the "Usefulness and Comments" columns.
- Comments will appear whenever they hover their mouse pointer over each of the ratings.
I don't know as well if it's an option for the mobile version. [...]
If there's support for your suggestion, I would implement it, of course.
I merited your proposal, as this feature of BBcode seems very exotic to me, as I only saw it used very rarely. I like it! However, it comes together with the lack of functionality on mobiles.
Having this in mind, together with the fact that 1miau already found a way for trimming the table enough (the power of 1% is so incredible, as always!) in order to still have all information shown, I guess we can use it like this (meaning the way 1miau trimmed it)? Comments column can still be left as it is, as now all text is shown... Practically we reached already what we were trying to obtain: implementing PrivacyG's new column while having whole table displayed properly.