Done, I've added it below my explanation where I've linked PrivacyG's contribution. 
Awesome! I added your note as well.
By the way, for consistency purposes I'd suggest one more small change: replace
* : BTC addresses starting with "3" what are they ? simplified explanation.
PrivacyG has made a list of all Block Explorers above working without Java Script. You can find PrivacyG contribution here to find out more about it.
**Some elements are not showing or working properly, but mostly works fine.
PrivacyG has made a list of all Block Explorers above working without Java Script. You can find PrivacyG contribution here to find out more about it.
**Some elements are not showing or working properly, but mostly works fine.
with
*BTC addresses starting with "3" what are they ? simplified explanation.
PrivacyG has made a list of all Block Explorers above working without Java Script. You can find PrivacyG contribution here to find out more about it.
**Some elements are not showing or working properly, but mostly works fine.
PrivacyG has made a list of all Block Explorers above working without Java Script. You can find PrivacyG contribution here to find out more about it.
**Some elements are not showing or working properly, but mostly works fine.
Practically, I deleted the ": " after "*", in order to be same alignment and spacing as in the case of "**".
Regarding our survey, we have agreed to collect votes for the following issues:
- Rating from Blockchair Bitcoin Block Explorer exactly 8/10 points?
- Rating from Blockchair Bitcoin Block Explorer over 8/10 points?
(suggested by GazetaBitcoin)
- Rating from Blockchair Bitcoin Block Explorer exactly 8/10 points?
- Rating from Blockchair Bitcoin Block Explorer over 8/10 points?
(suggested by GazetaBitcoin)
Basically, I'd say to let everyone vote the preferred mark for this explorer... That would simplify the two questions into a single one
- Removing "comments" column from our table - Yes
- Removing "comments" column from our table - No
(suggested by several members)
- Including comments in "hover format" - Yes
- Including comments in "hover format" - No [...]
Am I right here?
- Removing "comments" column from our table - No
(suggested by several members)
- Including comments in "hover format" - Yes
- Including comments in "hover format" - No [...]
Am I right here?
In rest everything is correct. Let's do this