Quote from: coin-investor on Today at 12:13:51 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 09:51:55 AM

Quote from: coin-investor on Today at 05:33:47 AM

[...] they have one inactive flag but failed to generate enough support for that flag.[...]

That's because the case that you referred had been answered and solved by the representative of 8bet. The DTs --yes, plural-- overseeing that thread had also came to the same conclusion, which is why the flag is not supported. Not sure why you bother mentioning and referring it.

You are right I should have not brought them up without further research but you did good research on OP's post history, apology for my error, it's clear that OP control both account, but why post on two different accounts when this account can do that having registered since 2018?
Is it because that one account is dedicated to Rollbit

If I may give a wild assumption, I think its more to OP didn't want to be found by anyone scanning through their past history while investigating this case that they have a previous case, proven to be guilty, and resolved, than they're the same owner of the other thread.

So OP copied the first thread on the scam accusation board and used it to edit their past thread. OP even deleted their post stating that the case is solved and they got paid, which unfortunately for them --as every single post on this forum is-- is automatically archived by several platforms. Oh, I also happened to quote that statement,

Quote from: holydarkness on January 10, 2023, 04:52:41 PM

[...]

Quote from: moegreen on January 10, 2023, 10:15:21 AM

Please note : Upon posting this thread the admin of 8bet.io has paid my withdrawal. Thank you !

As well as, they don't want people overseeing this case to know that the verdict given by Rollbit is valid, that OP did a multi-acc. Here on their previous case, the account is under moegreen1@protonmail, and this case is under justforvpn99@yahoo.

https://imgur.com/a/EzfrvFS
https://prnt.sc/EHjWAxwNn3kL

I think this case is as good as solved, since Rollbit's finding and reason is valid.