Quote from: coincollector12 on February 24, 2023, 10:58:32 PM

please stop thinking of yourself as the second coming of Satoshi Nakamoto

I believed you were supposed to answer to some questions unaddressed since January 27th...

Quote from: coincollector12 on February 23, 2023, 06:30:58 AM

Don't worry I'll make sure to address every word and punctuation you've pointed my way.

Oh, wait, I forgot you are here just to spread buzzwords.

Quote from: coincollector12 on February 24, 2023, 10:58:32 PM

you're not that important mate to be worried about someone trying to dox you

Actually, I am worried, And, like any sane person, I am trying to avoid it. 1miau already tried to explain the obvious to you but, of course, it was n vain, as all you seek is to throw zero-value words instead of actually having a rational dialogue.

Quote from: coincollector12 on February 24, 2023, 10:58:32 PM

No idea what a Cryptios gang is

Perhaps you are having a double personality disorder. Don't worry, "the other "you" knows who Cryptios is.

Quote from: coincollector12 on February 24, 2023, 10:58:32 PM

So basically because of the good Lauda did to this forum you support extortion and blackmail ? Kind of messed up set of values you have there mister.

You start to act same way saxydev used to, for a while. Perhaps imbecility is contagious. Meaning to say words which I never said.

Quote from: 1miau on February 24, 2023, 11:04:23 PM

Indeed. If Merit abusers are smart now, they could bring up that case.
And honestly, how could we debunk their excuses? Their requests would really have some sort of legitimacy...

I believe theymos feels proud for knowing he is paying such scumbags.

Quote from: 1miau on February 24, 2023, 11:04:23 PM

He could log in on his main account and confirm it, if his main account would write a comment confirming it.
Should be an easy task for him if he really wants to prove us wrong.

That would still not suffice... He could talk to a ~~friendly scammer~~ friend for making such post.

Quote from: 1miau on February 24, 2023, 11:04:23 PM

Quote from: Rizzrack on February 24, 2023, 04:07:46 PM

Why bother archiving something that cannot be undone ?

Why not, it's easier than posting a picture. And did you know that Bitcointalk is a centralized database? Maybe one day it might be possible to be undone. You are acting that it would be as secure as a Bitcoin transaction, which is bullshit.

Probably, after nonchalantly supporting scammers lately, Rizzrack feels also tempted about the dark side of Force and maybe he wants to try pulling a full scam. Yet he worries about his exit scam, because you archive everything. (Thinking is perspective is a virtues!) 1miau, would you just stop archiving his posts, please??? Grin

Let the poor man do a honorable scam... come one!

Quote from: 1miau on February 24, 2023, 11:04:23 PM

I don't need to mention how ridiculous your suggestion really is. Cheesy

Your suggestion is similar bullshit like once MinoRaiola's request to meet me in person, which is shady as hell and endangering our privacy. We should not engage in it!

The scammer supporter tries to look like the accounts are looking for reciprocal doxxing, to not be suspected ny anything while, in fact, he is looking to doxx me, lol.

Quote from: 1miau on February 24, 2023, 11:04:23 PM

What's wrong with you to pressure GazetaBitcoin to get potentially doxxed?
Are you proud to potentially damage someone's privacy?
That is as shady as it gets!

Yet he is confused about my negative feedback.

Quote from: coincollector12 on February 24, 2023, 11:23:40 PM

This might come as a shock to you, but people from this forum, met in real life quite a few times.

Probably those which don't care about privacy and which run to offer all their personal information to centralized exchanges.

Quote from: coincollector12 on February 24, 2023, 11:23:40 PM

But I kind of get it, since your pal GazetaBitcoin is all onboard with extortion and harrasmenet, kind of makes sense why he wouldn't want people knowing who he is.

Where did you take all ideas from? About harassment and extortion?

In case you are referring to Lauda, I just said that all she did good for this forum is what you'll never do from 10 alt accounts in 10 years from now on. All the scammers she exposed...!

Then, of course, without knowing anything, you simply throw buzzwords around. But, for the sake of showing what a piece of shit you are I will lose some time now and debunk also this statement of yours:

1. Probably you saw the topic Lauda/TMAN extortion attempt and, without reading anything from it, you start to stirr the shit, without realizing that all you do is simply covering yourself in shit.

2. Of course, you also did not read the archived topic mentioned in the OP of the thread linked by me above: https://archive.is/szqRf#selection-501.0-501.70. Meaning the one used as a basis for accusation.

3. If you actually search for that topic inside the forum, you'll see that liar Zeroxal deleted his accusation and moved the topic to Archive board, for making sure nobody ever finds it again: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1759607.0. Yet I found it.

4. Of course, you also never cared for reading Lauda's signed message, explaining what that shit was all about. To be more precise, it was a sting operation and in no way an extortion attempt.

If that was an extortion or a blackmailing, then Lauda were banned. Yet this did not happen. Why, dipshit? Would you answer why? Let me tell you, because you are just a piece of shit throwing buzzwords around, for impressing those naively reading just your posts and not the entire context: Lauda was never banned for extortion / blackmailing because there was no extortion nor any blackmailing involved.

All that happened was that Lauda was demoted from moderator position, as the way she acted -- meaning this sting operation -- was certainly not a good nor a wise thing to do. Yet, if theymos would have considered her an extortioner or blackmailer, he would have banned her since then. So stop throwing buzzwords around!

5. Furthermore, TMAN was also never banned for extortion / blackmailing (highlight is mine):

Quote from: TMAN on January 27, 2017, 01:23:45 AM

there was no blackmail - have you read the PGP message? if you had you wouldn't be in here. this is an assault from QS a proven scammer against Lauda I happened to of been involved as I was the one who bought the suspicious activity to light.

no extortion was taking place - it was an intel gathering exercise that backfired.

that is of little consequence now as all the evidence is in Place - I am awaiting return contact from moderators to discuss

Why was that? Again, because there was no extortion / blackmailing.

6. Even furthermore:

Quote from: TMAN on January 27, 2017, 01:12:58 AM

proof above - if lauda was extorting for money then where is the payment address?

7. Lauda's profile shows a Marketplace Trust score of +35 / =17 / -6. That's more positive Trust than you'll have in your life. From those 6 negative feedbacks, 3 are related to her vanishing.

Besides, by reading all feedbacks she ever received, there is no feedback from any reputable DT user stating anything about any kind of extortion / blackmail. Again, how can you explain that?

I'd go even further but I know it's for nothing, as you don't read anything and simply show up here to eat some more shit.

Quote from: coincollector12 on February 24, 2023, 11:23:40 PM

Still funny as heck though, seems I got a negative trust rating from the newsletter guy also, thus proving my point, why posting from an alt account. But go ahead though, tell me more how he's not abusing the trust system however fits his teenage girl dramas.

The negative feedback is justified by your doxxing-oriented actions. Such actions make me not trust you at all regarding any possible kind of deal and I wrote that in the feedback. This is what Marketplace Trust was implemented for. On the other side, you don't understand anything from this system, thus you wrote me a retaliatory feedback which only proves how imbecile you are. You acted just like saxydev or other morons, which react with retaliatory feedbacks (without understanding that (1) their feedbacks are not even show on someone's profile, as they are only shown at Untrusted feedback section; (2) their feedbacks have zero value). Now this is Trust abuse and misuse of Marketplace Trust system -- meaning to write retaliatory feedbacks.

Quote from: coincollector12 on February 24, 2023, 11:52:00 PM

But hey, since you guys have clearly no problem with extortion and blackmail

Any reference for this?

Quote from: 1miau on Today at 02:23:31 AM

Quote from: coincollector12 on February 24, 2023, 11:52:00 PM

noticed some similarities whenever Gazeta goes after someone, weirdly enough you follow him, must be just a coincidence.

"Whenever"? Cheesy

Can you point out, where else did it happen?
Or did you log into the wrong account to write that comment? Cheesy

Or are you just delusional?

I believe you are not actually expecting an answer from this dipshit, since all he does is to cover himself in deep shit, while throwing baseless words around.

Quote from: 1miau on Today at 02:23:31 AM

Yes, go to bed in time, 8 minutes difference to Rizzrack, well done!
It's been late in Romania, hasn't it? Cheesy

Last online
coincollector12 Today at 12:38:56 AM archive
Rizzrack Today at 12:30:31 AM archive

Lol! Rizzrack is one of most pathetic scammer supporter, liar and trust abuser.

Meanwhile, saxydev already scammed 3 users in less than a month yet this clown named Rizzrack accuses me of stupid things I never said nor ever done.