Quote from: 1miau on Today at 07:39:13 PM

There's a only a small possibility how we can end up having a messy outcome, for example if the following options will win [...]

But I don't expect it to happen.

Guess what? We already have one contradictory vote, lol. Of course, not all read the posts nor try to understand the logic and jump directly to posting

Quote from: Stalker22 on Today at 07:07:58 PM

It seems that I am one of those voters. I voted for keeping "Comments" section and with "Yes" at third question because I would like to see them using "hover" format.

It seems you did not understand exactly what you are voting for. And, as a consequence, your vote is contradictory. You can't have "Comments" column kept together with using "hover" format. It's either one or the other. Perhaps, seeing how "hovering" format looks like will help you understand the situation better:

Quote from: SFR10 on February 20, 2023, 03:28:34 PM

We can create a hover box by using the abbreviation tag in order to combine the "Usefulness and Comments" columns.
^{- Comments will appear whenever they hover their mouse pointer over each of the ratings.}

e.g. this is the result for the row that has the longest comment:

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating)	Works without JS	Rated by
________________________	______________________________	_______________________	__________________________	______________	________________
BitInfoCharts	Yes (09/2022) / No (11/2022)	No (09/2022)	7 / 10 Points	Partially**	ajiz138

The above format was proposed by SFR10. In this format "Comments" column is gone, yet comments are not gone at all. Comments are available by hovering mouse pointer over data from "Usefulness" column. This solution is elegant, as "hover" format is an exotic feature of BBCode. However, the disadvantage is that it's not useful on mobiles.

The other option is to keep "Comments" section as it is right now and not use any "hover".

For this reason, you can't vote to keep "Comments" column and "hover" format; nor to eliminate "Comments" and not use "hover" format.

1miau, for avoiding contradictory votes in the future (or, at least, for trying to limiting them as much as possible), perhaps it would be a good idea to add in OP of this survey the table from SFR10? At least, users would see with their eyes the possible change of the table, since there are low chances for having everybody reading all posts made inside this thread or inside the other one...