Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 08:38:03 PM

Quote from: franky1 on Today at 03:04:08 PM

1, protocols got relaxed

Define protocol relaxation. I only understand soft forks and hard forks. And I know that if there are only soft forks, rules become stricter, not the opposite.

you know very well about how consensus got softened you have been loudy promoting the "backward compatability" flaw that allows new things in without mass node consent
(backward compatibility transaclates to abstinance is treated as consent)
you know that older nodes treat new things as valid by default even if they cannot fully veryfy the content
you know the flaw. you love the flaw dont play dumb bow

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 08:38:03 PM

Quote from: franky1 on Today at 03:04:08 PM

3. seriously blackhatcoiner you seem to be throwing yourself back into supporting the same crap ideals as your forum-wife again. saying things she says without actually thinking for yourself. what happened did she pay you off to stay together

Seriously, cut the crap. Stop this horseshit before I begin to turn nasty. I don't know how you've come to the conclusion that I'm blindly following DooMAD's ideas and perspective, but I've got to tell you: I don't. The fact that members make perfect sense from his writings in comparison with yours should tell you a lot. He happens to be a lot more voice of reason than your perpetually refuted ass.

you deny following doomad then admit you follow doomad all in the same paragraph

as for what he says being reasonable.. reasonable to WHOM oh yea corporate paid centralist groups wanting alternative networks to become middlemen services for users so they can take a fee from users, whilst trying to ruin bitcoin to help push people to alternative networks

again reasonable to whom is doomads rhetoric?

as for refuting
show me the code, data, and statistics that back up you and his rhetoric

yes your echo chamber crew can repeat "franky is wrong" but you can never back up how or why. unless its just some "i dont understand what your saying"

try to escape your echo changer of confirmation bias of idiot group..

do some real learning about source DATA (not social drama)
such as reading code. reading bips reading moderation polices and development plans for the core roadmap..
read how things work from source code. not social clubs

difference between doomad and a rational person
doomad tries to recruit people and control people trying to tell them what to say and where to say it. including those who disagree with him

i simple say go do some real research and learn for your own risk awareness
if you dont want to learn for your own independent value risk and usage awareness. thats on you... but atleast try,, not for my benefit. but for your own

if your getting angry and upset that i sayo stop sounding like an echo and instead do some research.. then take some real time thinking about what you are actually angry about
because its now seemingly like you are angry either by:
a. fear of learning
b. fear of losing a loved ones relationship
c. fear of realising you have been a follower of social drama