Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:36:13 PM

Quote from: cicadasTR on March 06, 2023, 08:40:08 PM

What I was getting at is, no offence, but you're not good enough to get limited so how can you pass judgement. Though it's not just you. On this forum, limited means must have cheated. In reality, you get limited for consistently winning.

Fair enough. To add to my previous statement. When I was younger (and this was before crypto gambling became a thing), I had long periods of playing with 3 digit wagers (almost daily) on multiple online fiat casinos. Mostly on odds of 1.70 and above. I wouldn't call myself extremely successful, but there were fruitful months. Never once was I limited, banned, or investigated by any bookies. My priorities are a bit different now so I don't do that anymore.

If bachezy didn't do anything wrong and got wrongfully accused and had his money confiscated, he should continue fighting with a mediator and post the verdict here that proves that Coinplay was in the wrong. That's it. If no 3rd-party agrees with him or accepts to take his case, many will see it as case closed.

Yeah, it wasn't a dig, and you seem more even keeled than most on this section. Just that the rules for people who play for fun, and the small percentage that do it seriously are so far apart, you'd have to see it to believe it; books will openly say they don't want value or sharp action like Betnomi and a few others. Which is mad but there you go.