Quote from: FatFork on March 05, 2023, 09:26:43 AM

Quote from: 1miau on March 05, 2023, 12:01:52 AM

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on March 04, 2023, 10:21:18 PM

@FatFork and NeuroticFish: I believe that shitcoincollector12 (and, most likely, saxydev too) will consider you now as groupies as well Roll Eyes

I'm totally ok to be a groupie of you, FatFork and NeuroticFish. Wink

I'm on board with that! Just tell me where to put my John Hancock. Cheesy

Hey gang!

Quote from: holydarkness on March 06, 2023, 11:34:08 AM

[...]

And sup^* holydarkness!

Quote from: holydarkness on March 06, 2023, 11:34:08 AM

Hmm... I think their relationship didn't work out. "It's not you baby, it's me. I just can't see you suffer like this anymore. We have to end it."

[dramatic pause]

This is so touching... I almost leaked a tear Cry

Quote from: holydarkness on March 06, 2023, 11:34:08 AM

Did anyone realize Rizzrack finally withdrew his opposition towards dkbit98's flag? I wonder why and what changed his mind.

Good catch, holydarkness! Most likely, our not-so-friendly-forum-staff-member-which-supports-scammers tries to lure public opinion from his shady activities. It is also possible that he started to be aware of the shit he got himself into and, since for the negative feedback I gave him I used the link the the flag which he opposed, the thought that by not opposing the flag those reading the negative feedback (and the reference link) may believe that the feedback was not fair. However, I just changed the reference link from that negative feedback with a link of the screenshot showing him opposing the flag, thus his move was in vain.

Another possibility is that, after he sent me that unsolicited PM, becoming a staff user breaking forum rules while still being paid for doing that; and after I reported his unsolicited PM -- after all these it's possible for an admin or for his own master to have a discussion with him and explain him that his actions are embarrassing for the forum. In this case, again, he had to take the difficult decision of not supporting his scammer friend anymore.

More over, bear in mind that he only stopped opposing the flag, without supporting it so it's a clear sign that either he was forced to take this decision or he only took it for people to not see anymore (at the negative feedback reference link) that he was supporting a scammer. In any case, the current reference link for his support of a scammer is still showing his earlier action and I also included this topic's URL in the comment for the negative feedback, ensuring that everything is transparent.

^*For those unaware, the appellation "sup" has deep roots between me and holydarkness, from an era when examplens exposed the "sup fellas" spammers gang (the gang was defeated fast)

Since then, we occasionally use to greet each other with this "sup"