Quote from: arij on April 13, 2014, 12:37:03 AM

Quote from: NotLambchop on April 12, 2014, 11:43:40 PM

Quote from: arij on April 12, 2014, 11:16:36 PM

...Every shareholder here invested into the companies profitability at the expense of any and all voting rights. This is a profit share of BitVPS and nothing else.

In other words, you went into this sale knowing the shareholders were defrauded? And now you chose to argue that the shares, by virtue of being non-voting stock, could be simply annulled? Am I understanding you correctly?

We did not purchase knowing that the shareholders were "defrauded" or that the contract had been breached. We came to this realization a while after the purchase was made. Once we finally were able to get a true understanding of how bitvps was operating, looking through past financial statements, and seeking legal advice it was determined that the original contract set forth by rg had been breached long ago.

In that case, you were also victimized by rg, and whatever contract you negotiated with him is meaningless. I get the "Wild West Cowboy" approach to business here, but horse thieves were shot then, and so were the guys who knowingly bought those stolen horses.
And now you know.