Many mixers were seized but it is a first time I read documents mentioned Bitcointalk directly like this by Chipmixer seize.
You're misinformed. Posts on bctalk have been brought up in many legal cases, including several high profile ponzi scammer cases. Yet ponzi scammers are still here and not banned, even one you quoted in OP.
No he's not. He's saying its the first time he personally read documents that mention Bitcointalk. He's misinformed about his own knowledge base?
when mixing sites get banned here for promoting money laundering
Nobody promoted money laundering. You're hypocrisy is just wow as you walk around promoting a casino which has been
magnet for money laundering long before mixers ever existed. .
Wut? Is wearing a signature advertisement a promotion or not?
You could use the same analogy for people who have casino signatures.
Not really. They serve two different functions. Besides, most casinos (including the ones advertising via signature on this forum) enforce some kind of AML/KYC standard to be employed at their discretion. That means they will comply with federal requests for information about accounts whereas mixers will not. That's a pretty big difference.