Quote

Part of wallet https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/016e6d7cf163f8b7/addresses

How does this explorer work?
I don't think it's able to pull data of all addresses from an HD wallet.
It's pulling addresses from explorer that is connected in transactions and it can easily be misguided a transaction where the change address does not look like a change address but an actual payment address looks like a change address. I need to understand how it finds the wallet ID.

Anyway, that's not the topic to discuss. I am just saying, I am not going to relay on the explorer.

Quote

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1584539.0 --> signed message (1Eg5cXPCqBnpYJCoTornGAKCGAzyzAvJgq) by Blitzboy

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1716351.0 --> signed message (1Fh2GwdSfSDpfB5PpYjscB9u2inCoTmumX) by Bitmaxz

These connection came from that above explorer so it's hard for me to conclude both are alt. There should have some other solid connections. It worth looking for. If I am not wrong BitMaxz was a regular in Chipmixer campaign so he does not seem to be a chatbot shitposter.

Quote from: Rikafip on Today at 07:50:42 AM

Quote from: nutildah on Today at 07:17:32 AM

The larger question is should posting what is clearly AI-generated text be a tag-able offense?

Afaik, those who plagiarize don't usually get negative feedback so I am not sure that is the right course of action even for members that use chatbots. Its probably better to try get them banned intead, but its easier said than done as in some cases its hard to prove beyond reasonable doubt that someone used chatbot.

I think the community is still unsure what to do against these chatbox spammers. If there are any voting initiated by anyone then I will definitely go with "Yes to tag them"