Quote from: o48o on Today at 10:00:15 PM

Quote from: Unsoldier on March 31, 2023, 08:30:10 AM

I don't think Betfury have been backing their token lately. The casino is not promoting BFG. There is no use for the token other than steaking. Betfury needs to invest more in marketing the BFG. Only with this approach can we think about listing on major crypto exchanges.

I agree, but what other use cases there would be for BFG than staking (if by staking you mean getting dividends from casino profits). It was the only reason the whole token was build.
My problem isn't with advertising (although they could be doing more) and the fact that only use case is staking. Mine is the fact that future of the tokenomics of it are unclear.
Staking and getting dividends as only use case is fine to me.

With all sincerity, I think one of the flaws that casino tokens has is lack of proper usecase, for me, I do not consider staking and getting dividends as a usecase, would have made sense of there was other tangible usecases through which the tokens can be of great value in terms of price.

On the norm, casinos do not need a token of their own, but because crypto is not regulated, any body or business can wake up anytime and create a token, list it on an exchange, and then it becomes a speculative token to investors, where as for real, the token as no usecase.