Quote from: Evillo on April 04, 2023, 09:37:33 PM

Quote from: racminer on April 04, 2023, 07:50:31 PM

Quote from: Evillo on April 04, 2023, 04:05:16 PM

Quote from: racminer on April 04, 2023, 03:18:01 PM

Quote from: Evillo on April 04, 2023, 02:23:13 PM

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on April 04, 2023, 02:06:23 PM

Quote from: racminer on April 04, 2023, 01:54:40 PM

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on April 04, 2023, 01:10:46 PM

Quote

A screen shot is an actual picture of your screen not the text that you put here (no offense !).
If you do not share at least the executable form of your program, it is hard to believe that with a few cpu cores you can beat the 2080 gpu.
Again, I do not mean to offend you, but seeing is believing.

I bet a CPU can find 1,000 pub keys (up to say 48-52 bits) before any GPU can, with publicly available programs.

I hear you...however, it's fine, I do not have the energy to take an image and hunt somewhere to post it and then link to it LOL.

I know the program is real and works. I do not need others to believe or not believe.

This is a test program. Will it currently help with the challenge, no, it is currently limited to 72 bits. But I am trying to get to a point where it can help with my plan.

Another point is for the people who have ideas and are always shot down by others on this forum that something "will not work" or "would take too long" etc. If you have an idea, work on it; if your initial idea wasn't great, maybe you will gain more knowledge along the initial journey. Shooters shoot!

Ok. I get it. Just keep talking to yourself here and elsewhere.

I gess all these years Jean Luc Pons (https://github.com/JeanLucPons ) was on the wrong track Huh

LOL...no JLP was never on a wrong track. He took existing theories/programs and made them better/the best.
I bet he would agree that, "a CPU can find 1,000 pub keys (up to say 48-52 bits) before any GPU can". 100% (If you disagree with that, I will challenge you to a "race".)
He took a lock step approach to the grand finale...his Kangaroo program.
However, just because someone else creates/makes something that may be faster, doesn't mean it can't be. I bet albertosd would tell you his BSGS program is faster than JLPs, I think he has a video on it, I think.

And your Vanbitcracken is faster than Bitcrack, that doesn't mean Bitcrack sux.

This guy is clearly toxic. Ignore him and keep up the great work.

Hhhh I am realistic not toxic Mr Evil !

But you're not though, if you are, you would have googled the guy and realized that he has a reliable repository on Github with at least two innovative programs for cracking puzzles. Next time try to combine skepticism with research 😉

I've seen all repositories, compiled, tried and compared almost all of them. Repositories where no source code is provided do not contribute much to research.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1305887.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1306983.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5166284

and for up to date information, look here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218972.0 posted by Zielar (Thank you very much Mr Zielar)
also look here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5244940.0 posted by Jean_Luc (Merci beaucoup Monsieur Jean Luc Pons)

All of you keep up with the good work.

Oh so now posting links to puzzle-related threads proves someone is a good researcher?! Wow. I learned something new today. Not!

I dunno what's your problem with compiled code. Millions of Windows users must be inferior to you then.

You are right. I am sorry. There are no inferior or superior people here. I was part of discussions about this puzzle ever since 2018. In is not even a 32 BTC puzzle since July 2017...
Do your own research ... I don't know why I returned to the old post. Bye.