Quote from: nutildah on Today at 06:52:20 AM

TL;DR - What are the rock-solid criteria for detection & definition of AI-generated text?

I personally avoid using those detection tools because of false positive and (at least for now) I think that the sudden increase in English level is probably the best piece of evidence that we can provide to prove someone is using chatbot.

Its probably harder to catch those brand new account that use chatbots right from the start, but so far I had some success with those as well.

Quote from: nutildah on Today at 06:52:20 AM

For example, this post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5424029.msg62038551#msg62038551) - which I'm almost certain is AI-generated - comes back as "unlikely" to be AI-generated according to OpenAI's Text Classifier, yet it is "99% likely" AI generated according to the Hive Moderation checker.

AI generated text for sure. 4 days ago he managed wrote that and then yesterday he wrote the post below. There's simply no plausible explanation for such a drastic decrease.

Quote from: Maxre on Today at 05:38:19 AM

As you are saying that increasing number winning prizes will for sure increase number for your chances to increase your winning chances but I will say that this gambling algorithm don't work that way. As when there will be more winners than there might be more traffic and it would be more difficult for us win prize and probability of winning could increase of decrease by a lot of factors.
And also I think that we should predict on each side if you know that probability of your winning I'd more than 50% and it will increase your chances of winning too. I don't like those games that offer only 50% ratio as that's not good for us.