Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 08:52:47 AM

Quote from: Kruw on Today at 12:02:13 AM

I already proved you are lying when you said WabiSabi coinjoins were critically flawed, remember? You never provided any examples of any flaws whatsoever in the WabiSabi coinjoin protocol:

Now I'm certain you are trolling. But for the avoidance of doubt:

Wasabi coinjoins creating outputs which can be 100% linked to a specific input: https://mempool.space/tx/dae13b2d015587a3033d7ab7949a7efa6d6ed7aa782168b0651ab37a2d8390f8

That's not a WabiSabi coinjoin Huh

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 08:52:47 AM

Wasabi coinjoins reusing addresses, leading to users being doxxed: https://nitter.it/ErgoBTC/status/1585671294783311872
Wasabi coinjoins using the same address on both sides of a transaction: https://mempool.space/tx/af50a27691c0f0b7b626cddb74445a0e26bb6ed7b045861067326ea173bc17d0 (address bc1qft2uze947wtdvvhdqtx00c8el954y6ekxjk73h)

There are plenty more examples of the same issues.[/quote]

Since Wasabi Wallet is non custodial, if a user chooses to pay an address that has already been used, there's nothing Wasabi can do to stop them. If I use Joinmarket and coinjoin to pay an address that has already been used, is that also a "critical flaw" in Joinmarket? I already showed you address reuse in Samourai wallet, so are Whirlpool coinjoins "critically flawed" too?

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 08:52:47 AM

Quote from: Kruw on Today at 12:02:13 AM

UTXOs created by ANY wallet are publicly visible to anyone with a copy of the blockchain, any blockchain analysis company can see a UTXO exists and view its history no matter what wallet you use.

The difference here is my wallets aren't charging me a fee which they are using to directly fund blockchain analysis companies to look as closely as possible at my UTXOs.

[/quote]

Your wallet doesn't charge you a fee, a coordinator charges a fee. You can choose any coordinator you want in order to make sure you pay the most competitive price on the market.