Re: WasabiWallet.io | Open-source, non-custodial Bitcoin Wallet for desktop
That's not a WabiSabi coinjoin 
Three pages ago your excuse was that output was the whale, so it's apparently fine that user gets zero privacy. Now your excuse is it's not a coinjoin at all? Might want to decide which bullshit you are going to stick with. 
Your wallet doesn't charge you a fee, a coordinator charges a fee. You can choose any coordinator you want in order to make sure you pay the most competitive price on the market.
I do. I choose JoinMarket or Whirlpool, so my fee isn't directly funding mass surveillance of the blockchain.Wait, why didn't you tell me whether or not it's a "critical flaw" when Joinmarket coinjoins and Samourai coinjoins pay to reused addresses?... My question wasn't rhetorical:
Wasabi coinjoins reusing addresses, leading to users being doxxed: https://nitter.it/ErgoBTC/status/1585671294783311872
Wasabi coinjoins using the same address on both sides of a transaction: https://mempool.space/tx/af50a27691c0f0b7b626cddb74445a0e26bb6ed7b045861067326ea173bc17d0 (address bc1qft2uze947wtdvvhdqtx00c8el954y6ekxjk73h)
Wasabi coinjoins using the same address on both sides of a transaction: https://mempool.space/tx/af50a27691c0f0b7b626cddb74445a0e26bb6ed7b045861067326ea173bc17d0 (address bc1qft2uze947wtdvvhdqtx00c8el954y6ekxjk73h)
There are plenty more examples of the same issues.
Since Wasabi Wallet is non custodial, if a user chooses to pay an address that has already been used, there's nothing Wasabi can do to stop them. If I use Joinmarket and coinjoin to pay an address that has already been used, is that also a "critical flaw" in Joinmarket? I already showed you address reuse in Samourai wallet, so are Whirlpool coinjoins "critically flawed" too?