Yeah, it's a real shame that Trezor have decided to support mass surveillance by partnering with a company which directly funds blockchain analysis, but Trezor have repeatedly shown they don't really have any respect for their users' privacy. Take, for example, them implementing KYC exchanges in to their software, or their support of AOPP last year.
Still, there are other hardware wallet manufacturers out there which are not pro-surveillance, so just buy from one of them instead.
I see you were not able to find any flaws in WabiSabi coinjoins and have given up:
The transactions you claimed as evidence were proved not to show any flaws in the WabiSabi coinjoin protocol. Your examples contained:
-Not a WabiSabi coinjoin
-Address reuse
-Address reuse
At no point have you exploited "critical flaws" to show how a user receives "absolutely zero privacy" from a coinjoin if you are not the whale, because the "critical flaws" you claim exist do not exist:
You don't need to be a "whale" at all in order to receive absolutely zero privacy from a Wasabi coinjoin.