Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 02:22:35 PM

Quote from: Kruw on Today at 02:04:39 PM

You can be censored by Joinmarket coordinators who are using chain analysis companies and there's no way you could even detect it, so why are you using Joinmarket?
...
The taker is the coordinator of the coinjoin, not the maker

So as the taker I am the coordinator, but also the coordinator could censor me? Care to explain how you propose I should censor myself? Do I need to report myself to a blockchain analysis firm first? Lmfao. You have no idea what you are talking about.[/

Quote from: Kruw on Today at 02:04:39 PM

Yes, I proved that wasabistats is a liar who wants to destroy the reputation of privacy software: https://twitter.com/Kruwed/status/1642612625883164672

All you proved there is that Wasabi coinjoin outputs have a very high rate of remixing with other Wasabi coinjoin outputs. Continually remixing the same coins together over and over is not desirable.

Quote from: Kruw on Today at 02:04:39 PM

Obviously, since there were no address reuse bugs found in the open source code: https://github.com/zkSnacks/WalletWasabi

If there were no address reuse bugs found, why has Max Hillebrand been busy deploying bug fixes for address reuse? https://nitter.it/HillebrandMax/status/1586249382097088512#m Cheesy