Whats absurd is assuming any negative action would be taken against you for this result. Let's look at the results for your post from 5 detectors (its not long enough to be used by 2 of the 7 I listed here):

Writer.com: 47% human
gptzero.me: "Your text is likely to be written entirely by a human"
contentscale.ai: 100% - Highly likely to be human
writefull.com: 77% AI
paraphrasingtool.ai: "It's likely that a human wrote this text"

It would therefore not be rational to conclude that your post was written by AI.

Due to this inconsistencies in the above results, theymos is finding it difficult to make official rules about AI writing in the forum. I also think that some of those use the grammatical syntax of articles to determine if it is humanly written or AI written. But they ought to use the level of connectivity to an originating topic. Where this would be a problem to detect is when the AI generated post is actually the original post.

Op, you don't need to be discouraged and it does not call for retogration. The only implication of it is that it will drag the attention of campaign managers to your post especially Royse777 who already has rules against AI.