Quote from: Silberman on Today at 07:47:59 PM

Quote from: serjent05 on April 20, 2023, 11:13:02 PM

Quote from: Silberman on April 20, 2023, 06:43:10 PM

Quote from: panjul07 on April 18, 2023, 07:26:02 AM

Lets put aside about the proof of payment from OP but lets focus on the false advertisement by the casino.
The casino put a banner of NO KYC for crypto players, which is something against their own terms where they reserve the right to ask for KYC.
If you are a gambler who are against KYC and you see a banner tells you that the casino is a KYC free for crypto players, you must be very interested to play in the casino.
This is the main problem in this topic IMO, a false advertisement to attract crypto players who want to play anonymously.

Everything needs to be taken into account when we try to analyze the situation, even if the terms are very clear about the casino asserting their right of asking for KYC whenever they want, that is not the way they are promoting their casino, they are falsely advertising they do not require KYC, so any gambler reading that may assume that their terms and conditions will reflect such policy, when in fact this is not the case, making it perfectly obvious the casino itself is engaging on shady practices.

False advertisements can fall under fraud. They are defrauding cryptocurrency player by promising or advertising a no KYC for crypto player banner misleading them into believing that they are exempted of KYC but in fact plan to implement KYC when the winnings are big. Actually, the case is not a matter of whether the casino implements KYC or not, their TOS is void by their advertisement, just like in the earlier reply stated. As far as I know, when it comes to terms and conditions, the current implementation or announcement weighs more than the standard policy.

So @OP shouldn't be asked to submit KYC because he is a crypto user and the platform just promised through their advertising banner that there is no KYC for crypto players.

Now that I think about it your are right, in my country is the same, if a company advertises that their product has a very low price and then the clients find on the store that this is not the case the store still has to honor the promises they made when they advertised those products, so it makes sense that this could also extend to their policies, and anyone that tried to withdraw their money from the casino should not undergo any form of identifying process as this was the way they were promoting themselves.

On the time that they would really be having that kind of behavior on which they are really that misleading or deceiving out their users on a bad way or something this kind of method, then yes they could be able to hook up them but only just once because on the time that they would really be able to realize that playing on your site is shit because of those hidden terms and agendas about asking some verification on the time that you would be making out that withdrawal then for sure there would be no next time for them to consider on staying.

Speaking about to those sudden KYC changes then most likely it would really be having that kind of common introduction on kyc-less but if you do actually make out some in depth reading on
their terms and conditions then you would be able to find out most of them having that necessary asking out if ever they would see some suspicious activity which it isnt
something new.Therefore you should really be having the time at least on reading it up.