The most dangerous part is, who are these people to constantly policing over everyone? Ban the signature feature, 95 or even more out of 100 of them will make one or two posts in a month or week. No offense for any specific signature campaign member from Chipmixer, those who used to make over 50 posts per week when Chipmixer was paying for up to 50 posts, how many of them now makes 50 posts?
Take a look at
Active users and top posters on Bitcointalk.org in the past 7 days.
The page only gives history of latest 7 days. I am interested to see post per week before a date x and after the same date. Not much important though.
Be careful drawing conclusions from this: it looks like you have many local boards on ignore, which means you don't see all of his (first) posts.
This is another time of many where I fall into my own trap LOL
You are correct.
I see he started from his local board but it took him only two days to make his first post on scam accusation board and started giving positive input with good arguments. The same day after few hours he also posted on the project development board. In less than 5 days he started contributing on
plagiarism finding arts like how to use archive and things.
It's been years for me in the community and still I don't think I was able to find an account which is plagiarizing unless it was discovered by another one and I was in the discussion. Finding plagiarism, arguing in scam accusation topic really needs some level of forum experience which was enough for him two gain in less than five/two days. I see he is a quick learner and we need more members like him to make this place better 😉.