Quote from: nollaig on Today at 12:42:43 PM

I didn't make an account to promote this coin - where did I promote it? I defended it, yes, because people like you seemingly have not much better to do than to go out of your way to disrupt hardwork. I get it, you have 0 creative ideas of your own, you've done nothing successful in your own life, so you waste your time and energy trying to admonish others.

Now why would someone do that? Beats me. You think you're a virtuous saint helping others? Or is it a selfish intention that you've realized the disruptive nature of this project and are seeking to try to lower the price?

Cali Global is a REAL company. Not sure why its a "dubious" claim. Sam (one of the founders) was more than willing to share the equations and results with everyone in discord/telegram. Due diligence could be a useful thing for you. What happens when there's more testimonials? What goal posts will you move then?

You question someone's brilliance yet you've clearly achieved nothing yourself. Someone with any measurable personal success does not spend their time and energy creating fake accounts and spamming other projects.

If it is Daniel Mattes, then everyone in this topic just stumbled on maybe one of the most successful future projects in the world. Good luck

I am not invested in this project. I have no interest in moving the price. I just don't want to get desperate-to-get-rich people get taken for a ride.

Cali Global may be a real company, but sharing some details in a private chatroom isn't really what I would call open. The current Cali Global testimonial video gives more questions than it does answer. Unpacking that would be a good start: What is going on in the video? I know it's a "hard problem", but you can explain some basics.

What exactly being done in this video? Absolutely no context.
What is the comparison between the normal system and DynexSolve
Is DynexSolve using a single GPU or the whole network here?
What significance is the Windows Resource monitor here?

Look, I want to believe this is real. I like technology and progress. It's often the people that are rotten, so Daniel Mattes being involved is a big red flag for me, and that being denied even more so. Even before they made rudimentary mistakes with version control, they've had bloopers on their AMAs to reveal their identity:

As for your trust in Mattes I congratulate, but recommend looking into his previous businesses, not just the old Jajah and Jumio sagas, but the most recent "Artificial Intelligence investing bio-machine K1" from 42.cx:

Quote

Li’s lawyers argue Costa won his trust by hyping up the qualifications of the technicians building K1’s algorithm, saying, for instance, they were involved in Deep Blue, the chess-playing computer designed by IBM Corp. that signaled the dawn of the AI era when it beat the world champion in 1997. Tyndaris declined to answer Bloomberg questions on this claim, which was made in one of Li’s more-recent filings.

Speaking to Bloomberg, 42.cx founder Daniel Mattes said none of the computer scientists advising him were involved with Deep Blue, but one, Vladimir Arlazarov, developed a 1960s chess program in the Soviet Union known as Kaissa. He acknowledged that experience may not be entirely relevant to investing. Algorithms have gotten really good at beating humans in games because there are clear rules that can be simulated, something stock markets decidedly lack. Arlazarov told Bloomberg that he did give Mattes general advice but didn’t work on K1 specifically.

Read the full fascinating story here: Going to Court Over Losses When Robot Is to Blame