Quote from: Slow death on May 08, 2023, 06:44:36 PM

Quote from: Stakemeharder on May 08, 2023, 03:39:34 AM

Quote from: BlackBoss_ on May 08, 2023, 03:27:55 AM

Quote from: lionheart78 on May 07, 2023, 10:09:45 PM

This kind of people should be banned on playing in any casino or gambling platform. This brings more trouble than profit to the gambling industry. Not only they are blaming Casinos for the losses, they even put a lot of effort in defaming the platform where they got their huge losses. We have seen several cases like this in the forum, even filing a scam complaint on the casino platform which at the end is futile because they have no evidence in hand, and the thread is created due to hate and unacceptance of losses.

We must keep balance in our thinking. With any scam accusation from a gambler against a casino, we must wait for a casino response to see how true the accusation is.

It is more easily for a gambler to file accusation against a casino with their screenshots of proof.
It is harder for a casino to show screenshots of proof because as a business they have agreement and responsibility to protect user privacy including personal information. However, they can show some proofs that don't break their Non-disclosure agreement but still enough to confirm a scam accusation from a gambler is invalid (lie).

Quote

Obviously it is the sly scammers since they are the ones inflicting damages and losses to the victims. whether the victim has neglegence on their part it is still not right to exploit and scam others just to gain profit.

If they are cheaters and got detected, limited, restricted on a casino, they will try to be victims in their scam accusations with hope that they will be awarded something from a casino.

The problems with these types of casinos is that their terms are ambiguous with clauses that state 'We have the right to suspend any account at any time for any reason'. This makes it justified whenever they shut an account down since it is in their TOS.

Even Rollbit have this in their Sportsbook policy... 3.13. Sportsbook platform reserves the right to suspend a client account without prior notice.

This just happened to me, where they suspend my account when I was winning and still haven't given me a reason why. I didn't lose and blame the casino, I had 10.2k USD in there and they disable my account.

See the thread here with PROOF of everything. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5449402.0

Rollbit still silent on this case and a few others. Be cautious with them!

OP hasn't been active since March 31st of this year but I have to say that it's a little strange that they closed your account, from what I could understand from the thread you created in the scam accusation section they probably (I can only guess because not even they don't want to talk because they closed your account ) they closed your account because you were placing bets with very low odds because with that you would be able to hit many games, something that in my opinion if they ever say that this was the reason for closing your account then it is something very absurd

everyone knows very well that in games of chance, betting on games with odds of @1.10 does not give you a 100% guarantee of victory and even if someone hits twice or 5 times, it would be enough for them to lose in just one game to be at a loss, and everyone we know that if a casino has 1000 customers playing, probably 50 customers can make some profit that day but those 50 customers will lose everything they won in the following days, so the casino always wins, I don't see any reason why they are blocking a customer because he is winning when bets with odds of @1.10, I don't like it and I avoid making bets with odds of less than @1.60 because they are not profitable in the long term. I hope they explain to you why they closed your account

I know a lot of other sites have minimum odds to receive rakeback and it limits users from earning that automatically within their system. Should be very easy to implement. Shouldn't rollbit have this built in already if they didn't want people to receive rakeback for these bets? Seems that would be the easiest solution. On top of that, give rakeback only after the bets have finished to delay it being sent out.

Example is Bitsler, they have 1.4 min odds for rakeback and send the rakeback out after bets are completed.

Not sure why the player is at fault here when the site should be able to circumvent any problems with rakeback betting with minimum odds for it.