Quote from: BanderCander on Today at 10:29:16 AM

Quote from: BarryDnH on Today at 09:22:44 AM

Anyone invested in Ordinals might want to sell them off. Bitcoin devs planning to remove it.

They will link it to a hash in the future? Not good for Rijks new bulls ordinals project. He only has florin left. No coming back for Gulden - Munt.

So, just to play contrarian commenter here....but isn't it possible that there's an ulterior reason that the price is so low with Munt right now?

Couldn't it be the case that it's getting buried right now because the distribution is trying to be reset the old fashioned way via a price flush/base out/long term pattern reset? How many times have we heard that some project in Blockchain is "dead" only for it to be revived in some way several years later?

Some stocks/businesses/corporations/projects that are still alive today experienced 99% losses from their ATH within the first decade of operation...Centure/Gulden/Florin are all less than 10 years old.... And it usually happens that all the old legacy holders, members of the initial board, ground floor person personalities etc., sell off for whatever (understandable) reasons...but the Blockchain/service still runs...doesn't that mean a fresh restart could still be possible if new listings caught on, a more focused and refined use case that was locked in with regulatory approval started to gain traction, like the ability for merchants to accept and exchange the limited issuance NFTs, and new money with new expectations started coming back into a very different crypto space than when this project started....

If all that were to come to pass within it's second decade of operation...leading to prices that were previously unfathomable... and it took everyone who sold out long before by surprise...wouldn't that mean that patience is still the #1 virtue in investing, even when it comes to Blockchain projects?