Quote from: bettercrypto on Today at 11:14:08 PM

Quote from: Fredomago on Today at 07:34:12 PM

Quote from: Supreemo on May 09, 2023, 09:54:39 AM

Quote from: Fredomago on May 08, 2023, 09:06:22 PM

It's pretty common indeed but you need to keep doing your part in terms of reading the terms and condition to make sure you'll be able to maximize the uses of the gambling site you pick to play your game, with proper understanding of the requirements you will not be surprise if something is needed to implement since you do your part reading and understanding what is being said.

Accepting the requirements means that you are willing to follow whatever the house is implementing, for you to be able to transfer your money or for you to manage to take advantages of any offers that the house is offering.

this is a pretty common mistake which even veteran gamblers still suffer. we all know that carelessness isn't the main reason why people sometimes overlook about this rules and regulations, sometimes being excited to try something new out of pressure from other people can also overlook this rules, and much more common reason is due to laziness. also there's this rules that are not specially highlighted in order to confuse bettors, which are commonly seen on shady gambling sites or newly created ones without future plans and just existed solely to rob money for those who wanted entertainment. this is usually what happened in my country, there have been many issues like losing their money inside their e-wallets (our locally provided e-wallet) after linking their accounts to new gambling site. due to so many influences like social media influencers promoting, people claiming they won a lot and actually claimed their prizes and the fact that you can gamble with only small amount is the trigger why most of my fellow acquiantances ignore their security in exchange of money. to be honest it is sad and at the same time it's destroying the image of gambling which can lead to the future banning of all online casinos in our country, but most of the fault is on their users for not securing themselves.

Most is laziness for sure, thinking that they are already good in understanding the rules but still getting scam or being stuck because of huge wagering requirements as they did not read everything under the terms and agreement, I agree that even experienced gamblers can still suffer from same mistake and will also undergo with working along the site support team.

If you are lucky, you'll be able to solve it, but if not, you will accept the fact that it was in the rules that you needed to follow.

So it is still important that we know the terms of condition of a casino platform. So that in case of issues or problems we know as a responsible gambler. This is also because the problem of the majority of gamblers is that they can always gamble without knowing the TOC of every casino gambling platform.

So it shouldn't be just the game of the game in a crypto gambling, we must first know the dos and don'ts so that we are not disappointed in the end in a casino, because usually what we think we are disappointed in turns out to be our problem in the end not really at the casino.

We are ones responsible towards our actions on which if ever we do miss out on reading up sites terms and conditions and we do able to take up some violation, then there's no other should really be blamed other than you. Lets just accept that consequences but there are really that moments on which the site itself do make out some shady move or altering out their TOS just for snipping out their players funds or doesnt really tend to pay at all which it is really that a scammy behavior.

Having that wagering requirement on whether on deposit or on to some bonuses then it would really be just that normal because casinos or platforms cant really just give out or letting those people to make up some withdrawal on having none of those terms. It is really just that understandable that these platforms are centralized and getting in line with that money laundering thing which it would be normal
that they would be abiding on that. If ever they would be giving out some excuse and providing no evidence attached to it then this is where doubts and suspicions would raised up.