I am sorry if I sound rude, that's a bit intentional, but I think you have a trouble on addressing all the matters being discussed. This will the third time it being asked, so I'll just snip everything and focus solely on this matter below, to help with your short attention span, until it's cleared.
[...] How about the 5 stars comment and 50 supportive comments? These were made with honesty too?
[...]
I can't be the only one aware that you conveniently left out the part about stars and supportive comments? What about them? They're made by people who truly using the platform in subject, and all of them has to be extremely satisfied? 5 stars. Does it mean suppose there are 60 reviewers, legit reviewers from which I have no idea where you get them from, 10 of them leave a 4 stars review, which doesn't met your service agreement, so you'll have to ask them to not publish it? Quite sure cherry picking is not fair in the world of reviewing a service or platform. Is this honesty? How about if you only have 30 out of those 60 who gave 5 stars? You'll ask the other 30 to not post their review while hunting for more reviewers --again, not sure where you get the legit people who reviewed a platform for the sole purpose of reviewing it instead of getting paid for it-- and so on and so on until you achieve 50? Again, is this honesty?
I'll try to explain everything.
1. The project that wants to use our services must be valid. So, in the first step, we never promote scammers even if they pay $1 million.
2. Now let us say you want to promote your app or website.
2. We've a group of +100 people. We give each $5 to go and fully work with your website or app for 48 hours.
User Experience3. Then they are required to leave a
positive but honest CM about your product. It's called
Guerrilla Marketing.
All my words can be summed up in this sentence. We are
NOT required to tell all the facts (except for review articles. In rating and review articles like Backstage, we tell all POSITIVE and NEGATIVE facts) But when customers have paid, we CM only the positive facts.
That's the difference between a lie and a hand-picked truth.
This system is related to rating in Apple Store, Google Store, and Google Map and can NOT be extended to other services. Each service has its own algorithm.
All ad agencies have their own policies, but believe me, AntiDolos is one of the cleanest & importantly you will never find lies on AntiDolos.
Did you get your answer?Yes, I got the answer, as well as, I believe, everybody who read this thread. Though a bit implicitly explained, the nature of your site and the ethic you followed, your definition of honesty, can be summed up in
that sentence. When people did not pay you, i.e.: using your free service, you'll tell all positive
and negative facts. You'll have a lengthy dialog with the potential buyer like CryptoViking, inquiring about so many things --borderline grasping at straws, if I may add my personal amateur opinion-- while actually collecting more and more materials for your article and offering the paid service. When they pay, they can rest assured. When they opt to use your free service, though, they'll have a potential to [check note], ahh... deserved to be "shut down"
I think the tag is well proven and justified now.
Moving on to next topic. Though, at this point, I don't see why its necessary anymore, given the dark side of your service is already well-founded. Nonetheless...
Ms. Valge.I can see that you're quite well versed on crafting sentences to drive certain opinion. "consultant", "work with them", "working on". The announcement made by BKS was that she's one of the advisors, as she acknowledged and confirmed on the last part of her chat with you.
Flying overseas to help solve problems... and whatnot.
Your explanation on the earlier part
here, just in case I was wrongly understand it, I'd like to confirm, so you're pretty much brokering a lawyer? You're reviewing a case, if it can be solved by yourself, virtually, much like what we did here, it's free. But if it require a lawyer, you'll look for a lawyer in that area, charge the customer an extra 1,000-3,000 USD outside the lawyer's fee, non-refundable, and when they win the case, you'll charge another 5-10% of the amount won. All that for finding a lawyer for the customer? Or do I understand that scheme of yours wrongly?